Current:Home > MarketsPrince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K. -WealthRoots Academy
Prince Harry Loses High Court Challenge Over Paying for His Own Security in the U.K.
View
Date:2025-04-17 02:08:01
Prince Harry is facing a royal setback in his quest for protection.
London's High Court has ruled against the Duke of Sussex on May 23 over his attempt to pay for his own security when he's in the U.K.
After he and wife Meghan Markle stepped back from their royal duties amid their move to America in 2020, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex lost access to police security that usually accompanies royal members. Now, according to Reuters, the High Court in London has ruled his lawyers could not move forward with a judicial review that would explore whether he could pay for the protective agents himself.
The decision to take away publicly-funded security was made by the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, also known as RAVEC. And according to the BBC, Judge Martin Chamberlain said in his ruling said that RAVEC was not incorrect in their decision that allowing payment for protection would be against public interest.
E! News has reached out to Harry's reps for comment and have not heard back.
The ruling comes less than one week after Harry, Meghan and her mom Doria Ragland were involved in a "near catastrophic car chase" with "highly aggressive paparazzi," per the couple's rep, after attending a gala in NYC on May 16.
After the incident, authorities also addressed the situation, telling E! News in a statement, "There were numerous photographers that made their transport challenging. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrived at their destination and there were no reported collisions, summonses, injuries, or arrests in regard."
Get the latest tea from inside the palace walls. Sign up for Royal Recap!veryGood! (768)
Related
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- UW-Milwaukee chancellor will step down next year, return to teaching
- There's a reason 'The Bear' makes you anxious: We asked therapists to analyze Carmy
- Why Jennifer Tilly Was Terrified to Join Real Housewives of Beverly Hills
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- U.S. woman accused of posing as heiress in scam extradited to the U.K. to face fraud charges
- Saks Fifth Avenue owner and Amazon to buy Neiman Marcus in $2.65 billion deal
- Is Hurricane Beryl going to hit Texas? The chances are increasing
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- Trader Joe's recalls candles sold nationwide, saying they pose a safety risk
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Why Travis Kelce and Jason Kelce Are Taking a Hiatus From New Heights Podcast
- Joey Chestnut, the 16-time Nathan's champ, aims to pull off a remarkable feat from afar
- As temperatures soar, judge tells Louisiana to help protect prisoners working in fields
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- Is there life on another planet? Gliese 12b shows some promise. | The Excerpt
- Maryland OKs $50.3M contract for removal of bridge collapse debris
- This week on Sunday Morning (July 7)
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Federal judge sentences 4 anti-abortion activists for a 2021 Tennessee clinic blockade
Netflix's Man With 1,000 Kids Subject Jonathan Meijer Defends His Serial Sperm Donation
Federal judge sentences 4 anti-abortion activists for a 2021 Tennessee clinic blockade
North Carolina justices rule for restaurants in COVID
LeBron James reaches two-year agreement to remain with Lakers and team up with son, Bronny
The best gadgets to have this summer
Early Amazon Prime Day Deals 2024: Shop the Best Travel Deals for Easy Breezy Trips