Current:Home > ContactA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -WealthRoots Academy
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
View
Date:2025-04-11 22:00:33
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (5733)
Related
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- The drug fueling another wave of overdose deaths
- Kaia Gerber and Austin Butler Double Date With Her Parents Cindy Crawford and Rande Gerber
- Trump Takes Aim at Obama-Era Rules on Methane Leaks and Gas Flaring
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- They tried and failed to get an abortion. Texas family grapples with what it'll mean
- Special counsel asks for December trial in Trump documents case
- Go Under the Sea With These Secrets About the Original The Little Mermaid
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- How a secret Delaware garden suddenly reemerged during the pandemic
Ranking
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- Hailee Steinfeld Steps Out With Buffalo Bills Quarterback Josh Allen
- With Tactics Honed on Climate Change, Ken Cuccinelli Attracts New Controversy at Homeland Security
- Locust Swarms, Some 3 Times the Size of New York City, Are Eating Their Way Across Two Continents
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- 'Anti-dopamine parenting' can curb a kid's craving for screens or sweets
- Controversial Enbridge Line 3 Oil Pipeline Approved in Minnesota Wild Rice Region
- 'We're not doing that': A Black couple won't crowdfund to pay medical debt
Recommendation
Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
Here's your chance to buy Princess Leia's dress, Harry Potter's cloak and the Batpod
Duck Dynasty's Sadie Robertson Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Christian Huff
How Pruitt’s New ‘Secret Science’ Policy Could Further Undermine Air Pollution Rules
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Get 2 Peter Thomas Roth Anti-Aging Cleansing Gels for Less Than the Price of 1
Facing Grid Constraints, China Puts a Chill on New Wind Energy Projects
Ohio River May Lose Its Regional Water Quality Standards, Vote Suggests